Colleges protest boycott with newspaper ad
Former and current 'U' presidents sign in support
- Page 1 of 1
The UCU, which has about 120,000 members, passed a resolution 158 to 99 in May that supported a boycott of Israeli universities. Some union members who are unhappy with Israel's policies concerning relations with Palestine advocated the resolution.
Bollinger, who is now president of Columbia University, criticized the UCU's decision in a statement entitled, "Boycott Israeli Universities? Boycott Ours, Too!" that was featured in the full-page advertisement. The advertisement listed about 300 names of presidents of higher education institutions who support Bollinger's statement.
Robert Hornsby, Columbia's director of media relations, said in an e-mail that Bollinger originally issued the statement featured in the advertisement on June 12.
In his statement, Bollinger challenged the UCU to consider the effect a boycott would have on colleges.
"If the British UCU is intent on pursuing its deeply misguided policy, then it should add Columbia to its boycott list, for we do not intend to draw distinctions between our mission and that of the universities you are seeking to punish," Bollinger's statement said.
Coleman first made public her position on the issue in July when she published a statement similar to Bollinger's on the University website.
"At the University of Michigan, we have many valued connections with colleagues in Israel, and I for one am prepared to stand in solidarity with Israeli academics in the face of a boycott, should it come to pass," Coleman's statement said. "It is in the nature of academic boycotts directly to impede academic freedom and the intellectual discourse that are at the heart of our mission in higher education."
Several prominent universities' names did not appear in the advertisement, including Harvard University, Yale University and the University of Chicago.
University of Chicago spokeswoman Julie Peterson said in an e-mail that University of Chicago President Robert Zimmer sent his own letter to Sally Hunt, the general secretary of the UCU, on July 31.
"President Zimmer believed he could be most effective by articulating his position directly to the UCU," Peterson said.
Representatives from Harvard and Yale could not be reached for comment.
Coleman's statement said that the Association of American Universities, a group of 62 research universities in the U.S. and Canada to which the University of Michigan belongs, also opposes the boycott.
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 39
BOYCOTT ISRAEL
posted 8/13/07 @ 10:38 AM EST
Ann Arbor says "BOYCOTT ISRAEL"
Vote to boycott Israeli products because of human rights abuses is September at the food co-op.
See you there.
Mordechai Palestein
posted 8/13/07 @ 3:20 PM EST
Why would a Palestinian point of view be relevant to this article? This is discussing UK, US, and Israeli Universities? Israel's other neighbors, Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt, etc. (Continued…)
Boycott
posted 8/13/07 @ 6:10 PM EST
Is there one person, just one, on the whole U of M campus, who cares what is happening to Palestine, and is willing to say one word about it?
Russ Davis
posted 8/13/07 @ 8:37 PM EST
Palestinians don't need our help since if someone gets in their way they just strap on a bomb and blow them up. So since they show by this manifest derangement that they don't care if they die, why should they expect help? They pretty well shoot themselves in the foot on that one. (Continued…)
MOGS
posted 8/13/07 @ 9:47 PM EST
Until the Palestinians do something about their rather horrible tendency to blow themselves up in marketplaces, school bus stops, and other places full of women and children, I say they have no valid point of view worth discussing. (Continued…)
USsrael is the biggest threat to peace
posted 8/13/07 @ 10:13 PM EST
It is no use, the blue elephant is in the room and no degree of denial will make it go away.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
Israel is the most notorious world power after the US and the whole world knows it. (Continued…)
PC
posted 8/13/07 @ 11:22 PM EST
First poster - You're correct, they don't. Nor does your simpering expression of cowardice masquerading as morality.
Tobax
posted 8/14/07 @ 5:22 AM EST
The author (or editor) of this article makes an important error, which is corrected in the abstract. The UK vote in May did not support a resolution for a boycott. (Continued…)

Palestinians
posted 8/13/07 @ 4:40 AM EST
Congrats on providing no quotes on the Palestinian point of view, none at all. They simply don't deserve it. Ever.