From the Daily: Expression repression
Film festival brings the right kind of attention to Ann Arbor
- Page 1 of 1
|
Many state legislators, however, have found some material at recent festivals inappropriate; they go so far as to call it "pornographic" and demand that funding be denied to the festival until all its films meet decency standards currently on the books. In order to avoid getting stuck in the middle of this election ploy before the 2006 midterms, the film festival decided to forgo all state funding each of the last two years.
Many lawmakers feel the arts should not be funded publicly because some pieces are inherently objectionable and by eliminating funding altogether, there is no need to debate censorship issues. We agree that art is subjective and may offend some people, but art and the Ann Arbor Film Festival are necessary public goods for the state. Eliminating funding to avoid political controversies over subjective standards of decency and funding issues is destructive to the vibrancy of Michigan.
The concept of judging decency is relative. Never should the state be able to decide what people can or cannot see by tying funds to content requirements. Art continuously evolves from grassroots influences and free thinking and these state controls of expression would stifle further development. But perhaps even worse is the suggestion that art should not be funded by the government at all.
The fundamental reason governments fund art is that art itself is an intangible public good. Besides the revenue that events like the Ann Arbor Film Festival generate through jobs and tourism, they improve the quality of life for local residents by building up their communities to lively places of cultural expression. Cities worth living and working in not only have a strong local economy and safe streets, they have means to stimulate the mind.
Art is a necessary factor for growth. Events like the Ann Arbor Film Festival are a big part of what makes Ann Arbor enticing to forward-thinking companies who might want to move here, like Google. Even from a student's perspective, many choose Ann Arbor after they realize that other college towns have little to offer beyond either high rises and urban monotony or cow tipping and rural seclusion.
The recent debate over the Ann Arbor Film Festival highlights the broader issue of the role of government in revitalizing Michigan. Legislation that represses artistic expression makes it indefinitely more difficult for outsiders to see this state as a place where they would want to live. Similarly, tax-exemptions alone cannot attract development if the area is unappealing to residents and a burgeoning business's potential employees. And activities such as this pointless bickering among legislators further embarrass the state by scaring away progressive and creatively inclined residents and potential employers.
Viewing Comments 1 - 3 of 3
Ex-Punk Rock Alum
posted 3/26/07 @ 7:14 AM EST
Funny how you barely post teeny bop liberals find porno and establishment bashing free speech but if someone points out that most terrorists are arabs or that blacks would be lots better off if the men could father as good as they fuck you go running for the aclu whining repression. (Continued…)
Ian
posted 3/26/07 @ 5:59 PM EST
Historically most terriorist are of European origins, and "blacks would be lots better off" if the ruling class was not fooling ignorant people like Ex-Punk Rock Alum into believing that the root of the blacks problem is black men fucking instead of being fathers. (Continued…)


old alum
posted 3/26/07 @ 6:01 AM EST
It is no accident that America's two greatest art forms, as Camille Paglia teaches us, are film and pop music. It is also no accident that any perusal of the Publishers Weekly top ten list includes very few superior works of literature. (Continued…)